This post originally appeared as an op ed in the Calgary Herald Jan 27/12
Bunny suits and pig snouts.
That is what I saw protesting outside the Chamber building this week
during a speech by Federal Minister of the Environment Peter Kent. He was here to discuss the outline for Canada’s improved regulatory process for applications that have environmental implications as well as the decision by the Federal government to withdraw from the Kyoto Accord.
I’m not so naïve and entrenched in my views as to believe that there never would be opposition to decisions of government or industry, nor am I so firm in my opinions that I don’t welcome conversation of other perspectives, but bunny suits? Is that
what it has come to? Advancement of modern ideals and protection of rights and freedoms has always come from open discourse and debate – at times highly contentious and charged. Grandstanding, misinformation and odd public acts have only served to create divisions in issues, difficulties coming together
and a confused public. Individuals like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King never took it upon themselves to dress up as bunnies or throw signs over buildings of government to advance their cause. And they are viewed as two of the most
remarkable change agents of history.
Where we sit today is this no-man’s land. On the topic of energy and GHG’s, groups
opposing anything from projects like Keystone XL, Gateway or development of the
oil sands, are using misinformation and rhetoric to advance their cause. Industry is attempting to respond but is doing so in ways that are not hitting the pulse of the public. Companies like Cenovus, however, have got it right, addressing the advancements in our everyday life that have come from innovations in the energy sector and the products that are created through energy. In the middle is government
working to address public need and sentiment, economic development, protection
of our natural resources and environment and being a world leader. Are we getting anywhere? Nowhere near where would could be.
What is needed is a meaningful conversation. As an organization that supports the needs of the business community, I encourage business leaders to be open to new
perspectives and give those with different views, grounded in fact and reality,
an opportunity to meet and discuss matters with you. Very unique opportunities may grow from it, as is being demonstrated by the number of oil and gas companies that routinely look for renewable energies to support their operations.
I also encourage those who want to work to advance change
with industry or government to come with a grounded approach and request, one
that is centred on facts, and not driven by emotion, impossibility or
misinformation. I actually think that you will find highly receptive audiences in business willing to meet and discuss how projects or approaches might be changed to incorporate different thinking. There is innovation happening in industry, and through meaningful well informed discussions and discourse, even greater innovation can occur.
Meaningful conversations will mean much more in the long-term. Fact stands greater tests for making decisions than emotion. And looking to possibility rather than
ignorance and impossibility will at least get us farther than not. Beating someone over the head with how wrong or stupid they are, or insinuating they are some barnyard animal, never did much other than to aggravate and annoy. Those aren’t the kids of invites that we often accept. Demonstrations of willingness are often the best invitations.
I stood listening to the sounds of the small protest outside our doors. I am in fact glad there are folks willing to stand up for what they believe in, for if we all just nodded
our heads we wouldn’t get too far. But the smiles and the honks that floated around I don’t think were ones that signalled a lot of progress but rather a curiosity about what people would be dressing up like bunnies for.
